13WnY76j83

Yangcheng Evening News reporter Cheng Wei, Song Wang Qun reports: April this year, Mr. Zhu Shenzhen Lottery spend 20 yuan to buy a 10 "scratch" welfare lottery, in which two lottery display 5.1 million, however, when Mr. Zhu in awarding ,http://www.plick.co.jp/bbs/aska.cgi?mode=admin, two Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center was considered not awarding invalidated. To this end, Mr. Zhu will Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center to court,http://www.blogharbor.com/cgi-bin/page.cgi, claims,http://dialogqualitaet.com/cms/, including lottery money, appraisal fees, transportation fees, a total of 70,750 yuan.

On the 13th, the case in Shenzhen Luohu Court of First Instance hearing, the parties focus on a number of debates.

Focus one: is not invalidated

Chu believes that the lottery does not comply with his instructions on the back of the lottery ticket in the third term "scratch area is unclear or incomplete award breaks cover film does not open scratch lottery,http://www.fukushi-hiroba.com/magazine/cgi/talk/ftalk.cgi?res=207%22, are considered invalidated," the lottery does not exist is unclear and incomplete scraping not open the case; while the lottery does not conform to the description in the fourth "lottery scratch area awarding character altered, forged,http://johndwyerarchitect.com/,http://www.fukushi-hiroba.com/magazine/cgi/talk/ftalk.cgi?res=2%3C, and destroy the original lottery structure is invalid",http://www.compositfilmes.com.br/2013/, should be seen as winning the lottery, Welfare Centre shall pay the prize money to his 5.1 million.

The Welfare Centre, said the attorney, Mr. Zhu is not a winning lottery ticket purchased, he did not provide any evidence to prove that the lottery numbers are the winning numbers on the court. Instead, forensic Chu provided to prove the lottery is not the number "12",http://www.myshile.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=34022, but "pricked 2," is due to Loumo caused by printing imperfections. The back of the lottery rules is to prevent such a small probability event and advance to make the agreement: the lack of clarity considered invalidated if incomplete.

Focus II: awarding prevail in what

Zhu believes that the two "winning the lottery" can clearly be seen, scratch scratch area "Your time" than the "standard time" short, consistent with the rules, you can win. "Your Time" below bonus. So these two suspects lottery in full compliance with the rules of the game,http://dentmarketing.at.webry.info, Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center should pay the bonus.

Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center believes that if "race against time" winning the lottery there are three authentication methods, and Chu lottery numbers problems surface, the validation code and two-dimensional codes have shown no winning.

Focus 3: There are flaws,http://www.sml-producer.com/, who bear responsibility

Zhu believes that the Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center recognition of digital printing flaws, is Loumo, in fact typographical errors. As the Welfare Lottery Distribution Center, which is a serious irresponsibility, has seriously damaged the credibility of the lottery in the lottery, he had no case of dispute caused by the fault. After the dispute, he and his agent and Welfare Centre had no less than 20 times the negotiation, but very tough defenders, Welfare Centre is only willing to compensate for attorney fees, transportation expenses, lost income, legal fees, appraisal fees totaling less than 20,000 yuan.

Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center believes that the lottery Loumo technical problems,http://www.ini3e.com/home.php?mod=spacecp&ac=blog&blogid=, according to the relevant provisions of the back of the lottery,http://www.assetprotectioncenter.com/, Mr. Zhu can refund and replacement. And no less than 20 times the negotiation implies a Welfare Centre credibility, the attitude of ascertaining the facts, "the obvious is not winning the lottery, if you really awarding, and is the biggest bad faith!"

Lottery: "and nothing bought lottery tickets."

Aged 37, Mr. Zhu is Sichuanese, many years ago came to Shenzhen to work,http://vegalta7.s156.xrea.com/aska/aska.cgi?&item_id=29&view:replies=reverse, a monthly salary of 2,000 yuan. He told reporters that the Welfare Centre is a director surnamed Liang,http://waybetterthandaycare.com/, "You do identification,http://7-minutes-backpain-relief.com/, proof not done as long as the hands and feet, I congratulate you," so he decided to spend their own money to really do the identification of 3000 yuan. "But more than 20 days after the appraisal results demonstrate that the lottery 'not found scratch and chemical reagents subsided altered traces' Welfare Centre but overturned the previous statement, said the lottery is flawed, and resolutely not awarding."

"Welfare Centre to Loumo, defective, or even sell lottery lottery aside, there is no fault in itself, and these mistakes should not pay the bill by the Lottery." Chu said, was it hurt the heart, seriously affecting the lottery credibility, "From that point on, and I never bought a lottery ticket."

Welfare Centre: Before the judgment does not respond

Yesterday at the end of the trial, reporters want to interview one of Welfare Lottery Issuing Center attorney, declined to be interviewed the lawyer said, and refused to disclose the names and contact details, the end of the trial and hurried away.

Reporters call Lianggui Hong,http://www.blairsinger.co.uk/, deputy director of the Shenzhen Welfare Lottery Center, for a number of questions raised by reporters,http://www.nordbowling.de/, he was no positive response, saying only that the position and opinion "Welfare Centre in a statement issued before have all been reflected in prior court decisions no new content need to respond. "

Liang,http://www.russiandecorativeceramics.ru/, deputy director, said, "Thanks to the community's concern for the Welfare Centre and the matter, Welfare Lottery Center fully understand and respect the feelings of the current judicial process has embarked on the matter, Mr. Zhu refused to mediate, then everything to the courts to judgment, Welfare Centre to respect the verdict of the Court. "

Subsequently,http://www.birdtricks.com/, the reporter called the director of the Welfare Centre Wu Chengwei,http://kvkpharma.ac.in/, he said, "the matter has been fully handed over to a lawyer, Welfare Centre will not make any response before the judgment of the Court."